Historic Lafayette Park Online Newsletter Banner Image



Posted August 9, 2011
Newsletter Contact: TallyMark@Rocketmail.com 



City Attorney Legal Staffer Sent To Beef Up Contractor's Crew

In Winter of 2009, the Planning Commission convened to discuss the Lafayette Park Historic Designation and Rezoning application.  At that time, the Commission attorney, Chris Bentley, announced the application which was sent up from the Architectural Review Board failed to include their formal findings upon the contributing/ non-contributing nature of the individual properties within the neighborhood.

This omission would require that the Architectural Review Board re-convene and discuss the specific findings of the properties, vote upon these findings, and re-send application back to the Planning Commission.  This would have to be done as a public-noticed meeting of the Architectural Review Board.

Rather than wait upon their next regularly-scheduled meeting, the rush was put on:  ARB members scrambled to find a common time-slot when they could meet, the City Commission meeting room was scheduled, notices were designed, written and printed, and all of this was with the constant, unrelenting push from the City Attorney's Office.

There was no need for a rush, unless one were worried about the fast-growing neighborhood opposition to the plan.  People were finding out how many crooked acts had been committed to get the application as far as the Planning Commission in the first place.  At any moment, the uproar may spill into "pitchforks and torches" at the next City Commission meeting.  The rezoning plan to obtain control of the properties within the neighborhood may get derailed....

As an example of the extreme partisanship of the Assistant City Attorney against the huge majority of neighborhood residents and property owners who were opposed to being railroaded into having their property rezoned, we present this documented glimpse into just how far she was willing to go.

In the photo below of a printed email, Linda Hudson is sending her city-staff personal legal secretary to act as an envelope-stuffer for the City's contractor, Tallahassee Trust for Historic Preservation.  This is a clear misuse of City resources.  It provides real insight into the runaway train within City Government.

The Tallahassee Trust for Historic Preservation had stumbled and failed to perform their contractual obligations so many times on this issue, that without Assistant City Attorney's continuous intervention, the application would have been rejected on August 6, 2008, and numerous times thereafter.  The defects were abundant.  The justifications indefensible.

We continually wonder at the CAO's intense, unjustifiable collaboration with the supporters of this ill-conceived plan.  And, when we look at who received copies of this, we wonder at the silent complicity of city management.  
Linda Hudson email 2-27-2009
and, confirming, thirty minutes later:
second, confirming email
Supplemental to creating the "rush" to push through a defective application, is the hope for minimum participation from opposing viewpoints.  One of the factors in minimizing this participation is the balance between a mandated public meeting and creating major inconvenience to attendance.  The City is an old pro at this.  They know exactly how and where to hold a meeting that no one can/will attend.

In this particular instance, the meeting was scheduled for lunchtime on a very busy Legislative Session workday at City Hall, where the Capitol was right next door.  In other words, "traffic jam time."

Imagine the "har har har" belly laugh emanating from City Hall as neighborhood resident Farr Miller is ever-so-sweetly told to take the bus, when she expressed her concerns.  See photo reproduction of email, below.
"take the bus!"